View Full Version : Sigs
Mister Mischief
07-01-2007, 05:42 AM
What would be the chances of getting the sig image allowance widened some. Keep the height limit and kb limit in place, but allow a little bit wider. Is 375 something that was chosen because of board limitations or just an overall feeling of being big enough?
Spidy
07-02-2007, 03:46 AM
well NFSwould have the final say on that.. But as long as the 50K limit is not busted I would say OK.. :mad
nutsforsports
07-07-2007, 09:31 PM
Checked the sig limit and it says 1000? I upped it to 2000, so let's see what that does.
Mister Mischief
07-07-2007, 10:54 PM
That may be the board setting but they had a limit in place in the rules
14. No Signature Abuse, All signature pictures must be hosted outside of Celebswap. As your signatures have to be opened please ensure that they are no bigger than 375 x 175 pixels and 50k in size. Please do not link off site in signatures, except when linking to pictures. Celebswap already has display ads to help cover the running costs, so please do not annoy our members by making your signatures into some sort of web ad. (i.e. Advertising in your signatures is not allowed).
I think 2000px is way too wide anyway, so would 1000px. So as long as we keep the width within reason and keep them under 50kb you don't have a problem with it?
Spidy
07-23-2007, 01:50 PM
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Mister Mischief @ Jul 7 2007, 05:54 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> (index.php?act=findpost&pid=755071)</div>That may be the board setting but they had a limit in place in the rules
14. No Signature Abuse, All signature pictures must be hosted outside of Celebswap. As your signatures have to be opened please ensure that they are no bigger than 375 x 175 pixels and 50k in size. Please do not link off site in signatures, except when linking to pictures. Celebswap already has display ads to help cover the running costs, so please do not annoy our members by making your signatures into some sort of web ad. (i.e. Advertising in your signatures is not allowed).
I think 2000px is way too wide anyway, so would 1000px. So as long as we keep the width within reason and keep them under 50kb you don't have a problem with it?[/b]
MM NFS didn't really give you the OK to go to the larger size. We will discuss it further.. :thumbsup:
Mister Mischief
07-23-2007, 03:37 PM
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(nutsforsports @ Jul 7 2007, 05:31 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> (index.php?act=findpost&pid=755057)</div>Checked the sig limit and it says 1000? I upped it to 2000, so let's see what that does.[/b]
That means he was OK with it in my eyes.
If the answer is no then say no.
And why don't the admins have to follow the width rule?
Spidy
07-23-2007, 05:22 PM
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Mister Mischief @ Jul 23 2007, 10:37 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> (index.php?act=findpost&pid=757593)</div><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(nutsforsports @ Jul 7 2007, 05:31 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> (index.php?act=findpost&pid=755057)Checked the sig limit and it says 1000? I upped it to 2000, so let's see what that does.[/b]
That means he was OK with it in my eyes.
If the answer is no then say no.
And why don't the admins have to follow the width rule?
[/b][/quote]
well I will discuss further with NFS on the Size, sorry we dropped the ball...
As for the Admins, I am at 370 and morph is at 375, both with in the limits... And if NFS is too big, well its his site.
Mister Mischief
07-23-2007, 05:39 PM
Not that I think you should remove it because I think it's cool, your spider animated gif is 400, thats what I was referring to. Also I removed my avatar because it was 25.6 kb which is .6 kb over the limit, and I didn't want another warn. :haha: :haha: :haha:
Honestly, as of right now I don't even care about the sig size. Just leave it at 375 like it has been.
Spidy
07-23-2007, 05:50 PM
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Mister Mischief @ Jul 23 2007, 12:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> (index.php?act=findpost&pid=757609)</div>Not that I think you should remove it because I think it's cool, your spider animated gif is 400, thats what I was referring to. Also I removed my avatar because it was 25.6 kb which is .6 kb over the limit, and I didn't want another warn. :haha: :haha: :haha:
Honestly, as of right now I don't even care about the sig size. Just leave it at 375 like it has been.[/b]
I never really looked at the Size, but that is besides the point. I guess I will remove it to set a good example, which you need also to do.. :rolleyes:
Oh and you think a warn is such a big joke then why worry about it... ;)
Mister Mischief
07-23-2007, 07:58 PM
I have always tried to set a good example.
I don't think a warn is a joke in the overall spectrum of things. I think it is a joke that I was given a warn for something I thought was allowed, and that it's still there. And I think its a joke that I had that sig up for 2 weeks and nobody said anything until Rocky saw it. And I know he is gonna be on my case since I defended Xray when Rocky called him a troll.
nutsforsports
07-24-2007, 12:33 PM
Hello,
The sig issue was my screw up. The sigs are going to be the same size they have been. Any warnings issued since my earlier comments on this will be removed.
As a side note, no name calling or attacking each other.
Thanks
vBulletin® v3.7.2, Copyright ©2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.